Advertisement Close

Politics

Hishmeh: Support for Israel remains issue in US election

BY: George Hishmeh

 

Hillary Clinton’s long (57 minutes) speech after she won the Democratic Party’s nomination for the presidency last Thursday was indeed impressive. 

Although foreign policy is rarely an issue in an American national election she nevertheless told a very large audience that had repeatedly cheered her remarks: “I’m proud that we put a lid on Iran’s nuclear prograam without firing a single shot — now we have to enforce it, and keep supporting Israel’s security.”

But what about the security of the other countries in the Middle East — Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Libya, and particularly the Palestinians who have virtually lost their homeland and a large number of them remains in the Israeli-occupied West Bank which is only 18 per cent of their original Palestine? 

 

It was amazing that the State Department, which Clinton once ran, should come out coincidentally with a statement “sharply” criticizing Israel for building hundreds of illegal settler housing units in the occupied West Bank and conducting a spate of home demolitions in Palestinian areas. 

The rebuke from the Obama administration, the New York Times reported, “returned the settlement issue to the spotlight four weeks after the United States and other nations criticized Israel for continuing to build in occupied territory”.

Israel is believed to have demolished more than 650 Palestinian structures in those areas this year. The State Department spokesman, John Kirby, underlined in a statement that Israel “is systematically undermining the prospects for a two-state solution”.  He added that the US “strongly” opposes settlement activity, “which is corrosive to the cause of peace”. 

What has been disappointing is that the State Department is not adopting any crippling actions against Israel. Shockingly, these new Israeli actions have come at a time when Israel’s aggressive Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is now willing to improve his relationship with the Obama administration. His past preference was to await the upcoming leadership in the White House, which he assumed would be controlled by Clinton. 

The value of the projected 2018-2028 military agreement between Israel and the US is expected to be as high as $3.7 billion a year, but it must be spent in the US, unlike the previous accord that allowed Israel the freedom to spend the money on purchases from Israeli defense firms.

The recent expectations in Washington were that Israel can do whatever it wants since Clinton is seen as a firm supporter of Tel Aviv. Moreover, Clinton’s partner, vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine, is equally sympathetic to Israel as his record reveals, but less than his Republican counterpart, Indiana Governor Mike Pence.

Kaine, a 58-year-old former governor of the state of Virginia and former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, had opposed Netanyahu’s inelegant address to Congress, and he is described as having a “nuanced position on Israel that defies any easy characterization”. For the record, he refused to be present when Netanyahu addressed Congress, 

The New Yorker magazine reported that Kaine, a former chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on the Middle East, Central Asia and Terrorism had “used his position to stress advocacy for Israel”. 

It also revealed that as a co-sponsor of the US Strategic Partnership Act on the Middle East, Kaine has been endorsed by the American Jewish advocacy group J Street endorsed for his commitment “to making Israel a lasting home for the Jewish people that is safe, secure” and at peace with the Palestinian people.

Moreover, The New Yorker revealed that Kaine was criticized by a congressional colleague when he expressed concern that Israel’s leadership was leading the region away from a two-state solution. 

On the other hand, Pence describes himself as having a close relationship with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a hard-line supporter of Israel. Some expect this vice presidential nominee to give Donald Trump a pro-Israel boost. 

But the days ahead may still bring new surprises.

The writer is a Washington-based columnist.

Source: www.jordantimes.com

Donald Trump Goes After Grieving Mother Of Killed American Soldier

  Sam Levine Associate Politics Editor, The Huffington Post Daniel Marans Reporter, Huffington Post Donald Trump responded to the moving speeches of the father of an American hero at the Democratic National Convention by questioning why his wife stood at his side but did not speak. The remarks were clearly intended to question whether the couple’s Islamic … Continued

The Undecided Arab American Voter that Nobody Wants

BY: Nisreen Eadeh/Staff Writer The people who will decide the presidential election this year are the undecided, exceedingly informed voters. We know every bit of the candidates’ histories, policy proposals, statements and gaffes, but we’re still not swayed either way. No two presidential candidates have ever been more disliked by their opponents, as well as … Continued

Meet Ali Kurnaz, young Democratic leader who lifted Palestinian flag on convention floor

Philip Weiss 

Mondoweiss

For  those who care about Palestine, the most exciting moment of the Democratic convention took place Monday when a young delegate jumped on to his chair on the convention floor and unfurled the Palestinian flag. He was soon surrounded by a crowd holding up Hillary Clinton signs to make his demonstration disappear. But the incident quickly went out on social media — “a very human moment in a very dark time,” as Laila Abdelaziz put  it.

The man who raised the flag says that he was abused and knocked around by older delegates, but many young Democrats cheered him on.

“This issue is being brought to the forefront of the Democratic Party,” Ali Kurnaz, a Sanders delegate, said yesterday. “I believe that now, largely thanks to Bernie Sanders including it in his campaign platform people are starting to understand the issue for the first time. While others are coming out of the woodwork in support.”

Kurnaz is all Democrat: the Floridian is vice president of Young Democrats of Orange County, and communications director for Florida Young Democrats.

But for years, Kurnaz says he kept quiet about his support for Palestine. Born and raised in Orlando, of Turkish-American descent, Furnaz began doing Democratic Party work in 2007 when he was 17, and though Palestinian human rights were important to him, he says, “I learned very quickly it was an issue I had to suppress. Even as a college Democratic Party organizer, I would make sure that the subject was not brought up, because then there’d be a vote and the Zionists would win.

“But now it’s changing. I can tell most of the people of my age agree with me.”

Kurnaz was disappointed after he and other Sanders delegates tried to get two pro-Palestinian amendments to the Democratic platform ratified in the weeks before the convention, but failed. “We convinced a half dozen or so Hillary delegates to switch their vote,” he says. “But they said ultimately they couldn’t because if they did they would have no future in the Democratic Party.”

Kurnaz decided to take a stand the other day when the Democratic Party platform was voted on by the convention as a whole. He was especially nervous because the Florida delegation was very close to the stage and in everyone’s view.

“When they brought up the platform, I was shaking,” he said. “It took a lot  of courage, but I stood on my chair and I held the flag up as high as I could. People tried to stop me. They said things like, First things first, or Sit down, or Be respectful.

“At that point I didn’t care anymore. I didn’t care what anyone thought or what anyone was going to do to me. I thought they might pull my credentials, but I didn’t care.”

Kurnaz was soon engulfed by tumult.

“Lots of Bernie delegates from Florida who were around me were in solidarity and tried to push away the Hillary signs held up to block me,” he recalled. “That was the positive element. The negative was the pushing and shoving and shouting at me. People told me that I don’t belong there. They called me a Palestinian as a slur even though I’m not Palestinian and don’t regard it as a slur.”

His experience since has shown him that the party is changing, that Bernie Sanders gave people permission to be pro-Palestinians. He has handed out stickers saying “I support Palestinian Human Rights” and younger delegates have cheered him on.

“I have not had a single Bernie delegate say anything negative when I have given out these signs,” he said. “I get fist bumps, high fives. Or thank you for saying what you said. I get the opposite from Hillary delegates. But I have never seen so much support for Palestinians at any Democratic convention. This is only going to intensify as the millennials rise into the party.”

I interviewed Kurnaz after he spoke out at a Code Pink demonstration for Palestinian human rights in Center City Philadelphia yesterday. A slender and softspoken man, he nonetheless seemed excited about the political party he has worked so hard for for nearly half his life.

“I want to bring the Democratic Party to represent the values that they claim they care about– equality and human rights,” he said. “We are moving in a path of progress.”

Many people have told Kurnaz that he will have no future in the Democratic Party. He no longer believes them.

“The ones who say that are 20 and 30 years older than me,” he said. “I am the future of the Democratic Party.”

Source: mondoweiss.net

How Cleveland Muslims reacted to Donald Trump’s RNC speech in private

Aaron Sankin 

The Daily Dot

The moment Donald Trump stepped onstage at Cleveland’s Quicken Loans Arena to officially accept the Republican Party’s presidential nomination, the reality of the situation finally hit Julia Shearson. She takes out her smartphone and snaps a picture of Trump’s face, framed by a wall of American flags, that emanates from the big-screen TV in a comfortable living room on a tree-lined street about a 30 minute drive from the arena.

Shearson had hardly been in denial about Trump having a legitimate shot at the presidency. With a light pink hijab shielding her head from the sweltering mid-July sun, Shearson had spent most of the week leading up to Trump’s speech standing next to a folding table in Cleveland’s Public Square, a few blocks from the Republican National Convention, handing out pamphlets and having conversations with anyone who would listen.

Shearson is the executive director of the Cleveland chapter of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). Founded in the mid-1990s, CAIR was created to counter the “stereotyping and defamation [of Muslim Americans that] was having a devastating effect on our children and paralyzing adults from taking their due roles in civic affairs.”

She says the daily experience of working for CAIR is “like sliding down a fire pole from one emergency to another.”

One day, she’s leading a diversity training for local police officers. The next, she’s doing legal advocacy for a woman whose manager won’t allow her to wear a headscarf to work. Since its inception, CAIR has always been busy. But, over the past year, with Trump making explicit the anti-Muslim rhetoric that has long bubbled just under the surface of mainstream American culture (and the spike in anti-Muslim hate crimes that has accompanied the candidate’s rise), their work has taken on a new urgency.

At a small house party in the Cleveland suburb of Westlake, I sip lemonade with Shearson and nearly a dozen of her fellow activists as they watch Trump officially become 270 electoral votes away from the Oval Office.

The 2016 presidential election has been particularly dark. Amid a constant drumbeat of terrorist attacks and vicious personal insults, the only enduring moment of levity involved ironic speculation that one of the candidates was a prolific serial killer. For American Muslims, many of whom feel under siege simply for existing, the darkness is magnified.

All of the activists at the party are from the Cleveland area. The GOP drew the nation’s eyes to their hometown, and they were determined to use it to their advantage. The area immediately surrounding Quicken Loans Arena, where the convention was being held, was cordoned off from anyone without the proper credentials and guarded by thousands of heavily armed police officers on strict orders to be as nice as possible to everyone not actively trying to start a riot—and, even then, mustering considerable restraint. As a result, most of the protests were centered around Public Square, a city block recently renovated into a mixture of grass and asphalt specially designed to make the control of large, potentially unruly, crowds more manageable.

On the Thursday Trump spoke, CAIR activists spent much of the day in the square, talking to people wearing bright red “Make America Great Again” baseball caps and handing out packs of Islamophobin, which was just chewing gum in satirical packaging.

CAIR’s goal was relatively straightforward: Simply by being there and talking to people who see them as a threat to society, maybe they could change some minds. That grind is why most of the activists who eventually headed to the party missed most of the evening’s speakers, like former NFL quarterback Fran Tarkenton and libertarian PayPal-founding Gawker nemesis Peter Thiel. The seemingly endless maze of road closures also didn’t make getting out of downtown any easier.

I catch a ride to the party with Ahlem Zaeed. She’s been working during the day as a nurse at a needle exchange doing HIV/AIDS prevention and then spending every night at the CAIR table in Public Square. In the car, she is still wired from spending a few hours amid the tension of the protests, answering pointed questions about Islam from protesters, the phalanx of heavily armored cops standing a few feet away serving as a constant reminder of how violence could break out at the any moment. Just under Zaaeed’s energy is a deep well of tiredness. Pulling double duty all week has clearly been exhausting. She talks about her day job and her night volunteer efforts with the same kind of weary pride. It’s hard work, but doing good is rarely easy.

Zaaeed, whose parents are both Palestinian, began volunteering with CAIR a couple years ago. She has four kids between the ages of nine and 15. As her brood got older, she found she had more free time to volunteer, and her involvement with CAIR gradually increased. She’s thinking about going back to school to get a master’s degree—possibly in public health.

Zaaeed says she decided to work the protests during the convention in order to serve as a first-hand counterweight to some of the pervasive stereotypes about Muslims floating through American culture. “A lot of people don’t know about who a Muslim is other than what comes through TV and the media,” she says.

As we arrive at the home of Ghiath Daghestani, a former CAIR board member, Trump’s daughter Ivanka has just started her speech introducing her father. Everyone sits down on overstuffed couches and watches, except for Zaaeed, who walks into the other room, lays down a small, yellow rug on the hardwood floor, and kneels toward Mecca.

Everyone at the party likes Ivanka. They call her smart, poised, and well-spoken. Her speech was clearly written to read as compassionate and welcoming, which is exactly how it’s received in the room. There is, however, one line from Ivanka’s speech that draws the room’s rancor. “If you’re an American, my father will fight for you,” Ivanka says.

“Unless you’re a Muslim.”

“Or black.”

“Or a woman.”

That sentiment of feeling excluded would come up again and again over the course of the night. The group is skeptical of Trump’s ability to make good on many of his campaign promises, which is hardly unique, but there is also a feeling that, as Muslims, they aren’t who Trump was talking to. The America he wants to make great again is a slice of the country that doesn’t involve them. Watching the convention is an exercise in eavesdropping on a conversation not intended to for their ears.

In that respect, Trump’s candidacy isn’t unique. Muslim Americans have historically been a natural fit for the Republican party, with its focus on conservative family values and a desire the represent the interests of small business owners who often feel over-regulated. In the 2000, George W. Bush won an overwhelming majority of the Muslim American vote. In the wake 9/11, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the GOP’s general tendency toward demagoguery against Muslims, recent election cycles have seen the party capturing single-digit support among Muslims. In a deeply self-critical report released in the wake of the 2012 election, Republican leaders urged the party to reach out to various groups that were typically hostile to the GOP message, like Hispanics, Asians, and young people. Muslims—and Arab Americans in general, a majority of whom subscribe to religions other than Islam—didn’t warrant a mention.

As Trump speaks, the mood grows somber. People banter back and forth, alternately spouting facts that countered parts of Trump’s narrative and nodding in agreement with a, “Yes, that’s true” when he hit on indisputable points like China’s massive theft of American intellectual property or the crushing load of student debt suffocating America’s young adults.

Conversation gradually tapers off as they watch Trump’s speech, until one line hit like an electric shock: “We cannot stand to be politically correct anymore.”

“Uh oh,” says Shearson. “Here come the code words.”

“This is what scares me,” adds A’isha Samad, another CAIR activist.

During his speech, Trump makes a point of reaching out to demographics that typically haven’t been part of the GOP coalition. With a nod to the recent terrorist attack in an Orlando gay nightclub, Trump talks about the importance of protecting the LGBT community from violence and then commends the audience for applauding. The sentiment is laudable, even if the party’s platform has been widely criticized for its anti-LGBT bent, but Trump’s comments sting those in the room—like he is pitting one vulnerable community against another.

In terms of execution, Shearson notes, this is Trump’s best performance yet. But the rapturous cheers he receives when talking about terrorism and the threat posed by refugees fleeing the bloodshed of the Syrian civil war make her nervous. “I wish the camera would zoom in on the faces of the people in the audience,” she sighs, deflated. “Are these our neighbors thinking like this? Who are these people? This is really scary.”

“Trump talks about mass lawlessness, but he’s just scaring people,” says Samad. “All the people in the audience don’t experience mass lawlessness while they’re here in Cleveland, and they don’t experience mass lawlessness when they go home. He’s just trying to make them scared.”

By the end of the speech, Trump has accomplished what he had largely set out to do, whether he thinks of it that way or not—everyone in the room is afraid.

“I was concerned because I heard some code words that have been used in this country for a long time. He’s speaking to a place that we used to be. He’s hearkened to a hatred and a separation of people by using these coded phrases,” charges Samad. “He’s awakened that, and he knows what he’s doing. This is something they used to do all the time. They couldn’t say it outright, so they used these coded phrases—and everybody who knows, knows what it means. He’s doing it, and he’s doing it very well. Those are the people who he’s reaching.”

“Now, when they see me as a Muslim or … [someone else] as an immigrant, they feel freer to be nasty, to be hateful,” she continues. “When he’s talking about America in that way, I don’t think he’s including me or my immigrant brothers and sisters.”

“Muslims, Arabs, Hispanics, immigrants from anywhere in the world, I don’t think he actually sees them in America’s future,” says Nadia Zaiem. “Regardless of what he’s saying, if I’m not going to be seen as a big part of that future, how is that making America great? America, in my opinion, was built on the backs of immigrants. This country was created by immigrants coming from other places to have a better life. And to practice their religions and live their lives in peace and freedom. I think we’re backing away from that.”

Zaiem recalls a story a friend had told her about a recent interaction that was particularly troubling, that illustrates Trump’s America. This friend was standing in line to buy coffee in nearby Strongsville, and an older man kept saying that he wanted “American roasted coffee, not foreign roasted coffee,” and then cut in front of Zaiem’s friend in line. The friend, wearing a headscarf and just wanting to make it through her day, felt isolated and small, like she didn’t belong.

“This is what Trump is doing,” Zaiem says. “He’s convincing people that America is being overrun with foreigners, immigrants, and refugees.”

Zaiem’s father, Isam, a co-founder of CAIR’s Cleveland chapter, says the concept of division, of ‘us vs. them,’ was one he ran into repeatedly while manning the CAIR table in Public Square all week. “I found myself as if I were in a different world,” he says.

Isam recalled one conversation with a Trump supporter a few hours before Trump’s big speech. “The message that he kept coming back to, and he even used these words, ‘What’s in it for me [to let Muslims be part of America]?’” he said. “He kept asking me questions like, ‘If Muslim families … produce five or six or seven kids, in no time, we’re going to have a different America.’ And I said, ‘Yes, so what? What’s the difference?’ I don’t care what color you are. It’s not about you. It’s not about me. It’s about us as a community, as people. You protect my back, I protect yours. We are all in this together.’”

“I kept telling him that we are a nation of immigrants. In this country, except for American Indians, we are all immigrants that came at a different times. Some of us came before others, but we are all immigrants. We cannot just completely shut the door and not allow others to come in,” he continues. “But he kept coming back with all of these questions that really reflect, in a way, fear about becoming a minority in his own country. He wanted to keep it a white majority country. In his mind, he has a superiority, he had a privileged that you cannot take away from him. How you can address that? I really don’t know.”

That conversation, at its core, stayed respectful because, for all of their differences, both sides were really just trying to understand each other. It was tense, to be sure, but democracy is controlled tension.

At the end of the night, Samad drives me back to the Airbnb where I am staying. As we speed down the highway, passing packs of police SUVs parked on the shoulder and an electronic billboard urging people to report any suspicious activity they notice to the FBI tip line (“If you see something, say something”), she tells me about how she got her start in activism.

After missing a court date due to a mix-up from her lawyer, Samad spent a night jail. While locked up overnight, she was forced to take off her headscarf. Samad sued the city, claiming religious discrimination. CAIR was one of the groups that helped her with the suit, and she decided to start volunteering.

I ask if she had seen the small child playing in the fountain that afternoon across the plaza from where CAIR had set up their table. She hadn’t; her view had been blocked by a line of cops in riot gear and throngs of angry protesters. I had taken a video and, when she pulls in from of the house where I was staying, I play for it her on my phone.

“That’s what it like to be free. That’s what it’s like to be really free and really just not care what people think,” she sighs. “I’m just scared that things aren’t going to get better, that they’re just going to get worse.”

“I guess all you can do is cross your fingers,” I say with a halfhearted shrug as I step out of the car.

Source: www.dailydot.com

Pro-Palestinian sign yanked out of state delegate’s hand at roll call

Jim Brunner
Seattle Times

PHILADELPHIA — An Iraqi American delegate from Washington had a pro-Palestinian sign yanked out of his hand this week by a member of the Democratic National Committee — an incident caught on national television.

The incident, which left some delegates steaming mad, happened Tuesday night when it came Washington’s turn to formally cast its votes for the Democratic presidential nomination in the roll call of the states.

Majid Al-Bahadli, a Bernie Sanders delegate, moved in close and held up a sign reading “I support Palestinian human rights” behind state Democratic Party Chair Jaxon Ravens, as Ravens recited the state’s vote.

On Thursday morning, loud boos rang out from some Sanders supporters during Washington’s delegation breakfast as the roll-call moment was replayed on a video.

Al-Bahadli remained angry. “This is unacceptable,” he said, adding he didn’t know who had taken the sign until someone sent him photos. When he got the sign back later, he said it was ripped.

Wilbur said she did not see what was on the sign when she grabbed it. “It had nothing to do with what was on the sign at all,” she said. “It had nothing to do with the content.”

She said she did not rip the sign and returned it later intact to an arena staffer so it could be returned.

Wilbur said she believed the sign was blocking the views of people behind it. “The sign was there. We were doing roll call. I thought it was blocking someone’s face.”

Tearing up, she said she was sorry and that she had tried to apologize to Al-Bahadli.

Source: www.seattletimes.com

Interview with Prominent Arab American Researcher, Dr. Shibley Telhami

  BY: Kristina Perry/Contributing Writer WASHINGTON, DC: Dr. Shibley Telhami is one of the leading researchers on public opinion polling and research, examining American foreign policy priorities. His research often focuses on opinions toward the Middle East, Muslims, and Arab communities. His recent research presented at the Brookings Institute in Washington, DC examined the shift … Continued

Melissa Harris-Perry’s sage advice for anyone worried about who wins the presidential election

Aaron Sankin 

DailyDot.com

Standing onstage in Cleveland last week, a few blocks from where the Republican Party gathered to formally nominate Donald Trump as its presidential nominee, political science professor and TV host Melissa Harris-Perry had a message for Americans freaking out over the outcome of the November election.

That message, at its core, carries important lessons for partisans of all stripes—regardless of whether they support Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, or someone else entirely.

The former MSNBC host, who has since become a special correspondent for BET after her acrimonious split with the left-leaning cable news network, spoke for about five minutes to close out a stand-up comedy event featuring a trio of Muslim comedians organized by the Arab American Institute.

Typically, the Arab American Institute, which was founded in the mid-1980s to encourage civil participation among Arab Americans, hosts policy forums. However, as the group’s co-founder, Dr. James Zogby, said in his introductory remarks, the 2016 Republican Convention called for an “unconventional event for an unconventional election cycle.”

After stand-up sets from comedians Dean Obeidallah and Maysoon Zayid, Harris-Perry (who frequently had Obeidallah as a guest on her MSNBC show) delivered her remarks to a room that, according to the clapping when the comedians asked about it, largely wasn’t supporting Trump.

“I take very seriously [that], to be engaged in the work of democracy is to recognize that you’re going to lose about half the time,” said Harris-Perry, who brought along a group of her students from Wake Forest University. “I like to say that democracy is for losers. Democracy isn’t really for winners. If you expect to win then you should probably prefer authoritarianism, right? The fact is that, if you expect to win and to win all the time, then authoritarianism is just a more efficient form of governance.”

“Democracy means that, even when you lose, winners don’t take all,” she continued. “Democracy means that, even when you lose, you don’t have to shut up. Democracy means that even when your side loses today, you get to keep engaging, you get to keep a seat the table, you get to keep being part of the conversation, you get to keep trying to persuade. To lose an election is not to have a coup staged in the streets.”

Harris-Perry, who never mentioned any current or erstwhile 2016 presidential candidate by name in her remarks, charged that the idea of multiple sides battling it out in the realm of ideas and cobbling together compromises is “not just some kind of post-modern, millennial, feel-good moment.”

“We have to laugh because we’re human. We have to cry together because it matters. It’s part of our human vulnerability and I am encouraged that we can show up together in Cleveland and show up together in Philadelphia. We can recognize that even when really scary things are happening, we can keep holding on to each other,” she concluded. “… I thank you for letting my students be here, for laughing even when you sometimes want to cry, and for saying that, even if we lose, it doesn’t mean we have to shut up. We can keep talking and, even if the other side loses, that doesn’t mean they have to shut up either. That’s part of the big project of democracy together.”

Source: www.dailydot.com

US conventions leave American Arabs and Muslims unimpressed

James Reinl
Middle East Eye

PHILADELPHIA, United States – Few Arab or Muslim Americans expected Donald Trump’s coronation at the Republican National Convention (RNC) in Cleveland to be a joyous affair. After three days in Pennsylvania’s sweltering heat, the Democratic shindig has proven similarly underwhelming.

US television networks have highlighted the lacklustre support grassroots activists from both main parties have afforded their nominees: Trump, a tough-talking New York tycoon, and his Democratic rival, the career politician Hillary Clinton.

But the subtext – that Trump’s bashing of Muslims, Mexicans and other groups is countered by a Democratic “big tent” to shield all minorities, is increasingly being challenged by those attending the Democratic National Convention (DNC) here in Philadelphia. 

While the RNC crowd in Cleveland was whiter, and without a niqab in sight, the politics are not so different at the DNC, Raed Jarrar, a policy analyst at the American Friends Service Committee, a Quaker group, told Middle East Eye.

“The optics are different between the DNC and the RNC, which was less diverse, but the actual policies between the two parties are, unfortunately, almost identical,” said Jarrar, a Washington-based blogger.

Jarrar and others highlight the Democratic platform, or manifesto, which continues to prioritise the rights of Israelis over Palestinians, despite the efforts of Clinton’s former Democratic rival, Bernie Sanders, to treat both sides in the decades-old conflict equally.

But what really bugged Muslims this week was Bill Clinton, the Democratic nominee’s husband and former president, who started riffing at the tail-end of an impassioned speech about why Americans should send his wife back to the White House.

“If you’re a Muslim and you love America and freedom and you hate terror, stay here and help us win and make a future together, we want you,” Clinton said, naming the various groups with a stake in a Democrat-led America.

Though seemingly harmless, it jarred with many Muslims because it seemingly accepted an assumption that they must work harder to show patriotism than others – a touchy subject in the wake of post-9/11 racial profiling and police raids on mosques. 

“The assumptions behind this are that Muslim Americans should be singled out and required to prove their loyalty and Americanism more than others,” said Jarrar. “The assumption that they should be kicked out of the country is really shocking to hear in 2016.”

Similarly, the failure of the Democrats to bring more of Sanders’ input into Israel-Palestine policy remained a bone of contention among the Muslims and Arabs who are ideologically torn over supporting America’s main liberal party.

The Democratic platform, agreed in Philadelphia this week, calls for “a strong and secure Israel” of which Jerusalem should “remain the capital”. Democrats pledge to “oppose any effort to delegitimise Israel, including at the UN or through” a boycott movement, known as BDS.

“Language against BDS shows how biased the platform is,” said Jarrar. “It’s another example of how US citizens don’t have many options when it comes to US foreign policy and militarism. Democrats and Republican candidates are almost identical.” 

James Zogby, founder and president of the Arab American Institute (AAI), sat on the platform committee and said there was much “good language” on Middle East issues in the document, but ultimately warned that it would fail to advance the stymied Middle East peace process.

Pursuing the Democratic agenda towards Israel would continue the “region’s depressing and dangerous downwards spiral of oppression and violence”. The more pro-Israel Republican policy, alternatively, is worse and would yield “disaster,” he added.

Against this backdrop, Arab and Muslim Americans would doubtless have a tougher time under a President Trump.

The celebrity realtor has famously rounded on Muslims, unveiling plans to stop Islam’s adherents from entering the US. He has also blasted Syrian refugees and an unverified number of New Jersey residents who celebrated the 9/11 attacks.

Although some have joined the “Muslims for Trump” group, Zogby doubts they represent a significant chunk of the estimated 3.5-4.5 million Muslim Americans.

On 8 November, US Muslims will mostly back Clinton over Trump, despite the misgivings expressed by Muslim activists in Philadelphia this week, Zogby said. The former first lady may need it – opinion polls show she trails Trump by 1.1 percentage points.

“I dare say that the Democratic ticket will do very well, the Republican ticket will not do very well, despite their cherry-picking efforts,” Zogby said of Muslim voters on the side-lines of the convention this week.

According to Maya Berry, executive director of AAI, a lobby group, an estimated 3.7 million Arab Americans – a mixture of Muslims, Christians, atheists and others – may play a key role in the battleground states that could yield the keys to the Oval Office.

According to Berry, Arab Americans represent some five percent of voters in Michigan, a key swing state, as well as two percent of voters in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia and other battlegrounds.

“So in an election that’s close, we’re definitely within the margin of victory on that,” Berry told journalists in Philadelphia.

Arab Americans are not yet counted in the US census, so the population figure of 3.7 million may be an inflated estimate that equates to about 1.1 percent of the population. Latinos (17.4 percent) and blacks (13.2 percent) are bigger chunks of the melting-pot nation.

With traditions of social and economic conservatism, they were evenly split between the main parties until the turn of the century, and backed George W Bush by 44.5 per cent in the 2000 presidential election, according to pollster John Zogby.

Since the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington, Arab Americans edged left and currently favour the Democrats (about 40 per cent) over the Republicans (20 per cent), while 30 per cent remain independent, according to AAI. 

Arab Americans are typically small business owners and professionals who are swayed by the same bread-and-butter issues as other Americans – jobs, taxes, schools and hospitals. US foreign policy is important, but not paramount, according to AAI studies.

They are being driven even further into the Democratic fold this election cycle, analysts say. There are exceptions, though. Mariam Noujaim, a Maronite Christian from Lebanon who has lived in California since 1979, will vote for Trump in November.

“He’s going to attack the terrorists. You can’t be lenient with these people,” Noujaim said of Trump’s policy against the Islamic State (IS group). Bombing IS oil fields will “cut off their money source, their oxygen” and help address the violence that plagues the region, she told MEE.

Source: www.middleeasteye.net

Why Can’t the Clinton Campaign Stop Treating Muslim Americans Like Tools in the War on Terror?

By Sarah Lazare

AlterNet 

Today, there are at least 3.3 million Muslims living in the United States, with Muslims now comprising roughly one percent of the population and constituting the fastest-growing religious group in the country.

But during former President Bill Clinton’s much-anticipated speech at the Democratic National Convention on Tuesday night, Muslim Americans were depicted as foreigners, welcome only to the extent that they assist the so-called war on terror.

“If you’re a Muslim and you love America and freedom and you hate terror, stay here and help us win and make a future together,” said Bill Clinton, to uproarious applause. “We want you.”

Muslim civil rights campaigners were quick to raise concerns about the false assumptions underlying the former president’s statement, with Imraan Siddiqi of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) taking to social media Tuesday night to point out the obvious: “Muslims aren’t a foreign entity.”

Please fill out this short app:
Love America? ✅
Love Freedom? ✅
Love Terror? ❌
*Great, you’re pre-qualified to stay!

— Imraan Siddiqi (@imraansiddiqi) July 27, 2016

In an election cycle defined by fever-pitch anti-Muslim incitement, it is an unfortunate necessity for Muslims to emphasize this fact. As the GOP nominee Donald Trump repeatedly vows to impose a ban on Muslims and kill the family members of ISIS, his key supporters continue to ratchet up their rhetoric, fueling a climate of incitement that appears to be contributing to an uptick in hate crimes.

In the immediate aftermath of the July 14 Nice, France attacks, Trump backer and former House speaker Newt Gingrich proclaimed during an appearance on Fox News’ Sean Hannity, “Western civilization is in a war. We should frankly test every person here who is of a Muslim background and if they believe in sharia they should be deported.”

The implication that the “Americanness” of Muslim U.S. citizens is somehow suspect on the basis of religious or ethnic background also surfaced in Bill Clinton’s remarks. And herein lies a troubling reality: even as the Clinton campaign portrays itself as taking a stand for tolerance against Trump-style bigotry, it also employs Islamophobic rhetoric that is dangerous in its own right.

In December 2015, in the immediate aftermath of the San Bernardino massacre, Hillary Clinton delivered a foreign policy address at the Brookings Institution in which she stated:

We’re going to have to have more support from our friends in the technology world to deny online space. Just as we have to destroy [ISIS’s] would-be caliphate, we have to deny them online space. And this is complicated. You’re going to hear all of the usual complaints, you know, freedom of speech, etc. But if we truly are in a war against terrorism and we are truly looking for ways to shut off their funding, shut off the flow of foreign fighters, then we’ve got to shut off their means of communicating.

More recently, after the mass killing at the Orlando LGBTQ Pulse club, Clinton was quick to point blame at “radical Islamism,” even though the heads of the CIA and FBI both say there is no evidence that the shooter had material connections to Islamist militant groups outside of the United States.

As Khaled Beydoun, assistant professor Barry University Dwayne O Andreas School of Law, recently argued: “Clinton’s rhetoric towards Muslims rings with tolerance. But it is frequently flanked with qualifiers such as ‘terror-hating,’ ‘peace-loving’ or the seemingly benign, yet divisive ‘moderate Muslim’ tag.”

But the Clinton campaign’s problem with Islamophobia also extends to her vast network of surrogates and backers.

Eleven advocacy organizations signed an open letter in December of 2015 expressing concern about her campaign surrogate, the retired general Wesley Clark, who has previously called for the interning of some Muslim-Americans. “If these people are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they are disloyal to the United States as a matter of principle, fine,” Clark told MSNBC in July 2015. “It’s their right and it’s our right and obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the duration of the conflict.”

Another major Clinton backer, the pro-Israel donor Haim Saban, declared in the aftermath of the November 2015 Paris attacks that the U.S. should escalate its surveillance of Muslim-American communities. “I’m not suggesting we put Muslims through some kind of a torture room to get them to admit that they are or they’re not terrorists,” he told TheWrap. “But I am saying we should have more scrutiny.”

And Electronic Intifada journalist Rania Khalek recently noted that Clinton’s troubling relationship with Muslim and Arab Americans dates back to the dawn of her career in electoral politics. During her 2000 Senate race, Clinton was criticized for accepting contributions from Muslim organizations targeted by an Islamophobic smear campaign. “Without hesitation,” writes Khalek, “Clinton condemned her Muslim supporters, returned their donations and refused to meet with Arab and Muslim Americans for the remainder of her campaign.”

The Clinton campaign is presenting itself as the reasonable alternative to Donald Trump’s bigotry. But that doesn’t place it above scrutiny, especially when it casually echoes the Islamophobic themes emanating from the far-right. 

But according to Darakshan Raja, founder of the Muslim American Women’s Policy Forum, “Bill Clinton didn’t use Trump’s rhetoric. Trump expanded on the rhetoric and policies Bill Clinton implemented. Trump is successful because Bill Clinton as a president passed some of the most draconian laws from the 1994 Crime Bill, the 1996 anti-terrorism laws, and the 1996 illegal immigration bills.”

Source: www.alternet.org

Arab American org joins privacy groups in DNC anti-surveillance push

Jeremey Seth Davis

SC Magazine

 

An Arab-American policy organization in the U.S. has joined with civil liberties and privacy groups to address domestic surveillance policies that target Arab American and American Muslim communities.

Arab American Institute executive director Maya Berry participated on a panel discussion highlighting digital aspects of civil rights and civil liberties priorities on Wednesday during day three of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia. The discussion involved American Civil Liberties Union president Susan Herman, Center for Constitutional Rights executive director Vincent Warren, and New York University School of Law’s Brennan Center for Justice Fellow Michael German.

The session tackled government surveillance programs and policies, such as the Department of Justice’s 2014 guidance that expanded the parameters of an ethnic and religious profiling ban to extend to state and local law enforcement law authorities.

Last month, the group participated in a coalition opposing warrantless mass surveillance and called on legislators to not renew Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008.

Source: www.scmagazine.com

Protestors Burn Israeli Flag Outside of DNC

BY: Andrew Hansen/Contributing Writer Flags Are Burned This week, at the highly anticipated arrival of the Democratic National Convention, the majority of the attendees had more to say than endorsing Hillary Clinton. Inside the convention, popular figures like Michelle Obama and Bill Clinton spoke on behalf of the Democratic nominee, while outside the convention’s doors, … Continued

1,451 Results (Page 79 of 121)